MINIATURE OF THE PROPOSED CAPSULE DORMITORY AT BESTLINK COLLEGE OF THE PHILIPPINES, MV CAMPUS

Abstract

Capsule sleeping pods, also known as sleep pods or capsule hotels, are compact, self-contained sleeping units designed for short-term use. These innovative pods offer an efficient and unique solution for students, workers, or anyone looking for a quick, comfortable rest. Located within Bestlink College of the Philippines, MV Campus, these pods provide a practical and space-efficient way to relax in a busy setting. With their modern design, they combine convenience, comfort, and functionality, making them a perfect option for those seeking a break without leaving the campus. This study utilized a quantitative approach with a descriptive method, employing purposive sampling. A survey questionnaire served as the research instrument to evaluate the level of acceptability in terms of construction materials, structural design, floor plan, space efficiency, and presentation. The data were analyzed using statistical tools, including frequency and percentage, weighted mean, and t-test, to identify any significant differences between the assessments of the two respondent groups. The findings of the study reveal that the proposed miniature response is deemed "Acceptable" in terms of construction materials, structural design, floor plan, space efficiency, and presentation. The Civil Engineers' overall weighted mean was 3.21, with a variance of 0.2012, a t-computed value of 0.7937, and a degree of freedom of 8. The t-critical value at α=0.05 was 2.306. On the other hand, the Architects' mean score was 2.99, with a variance of 0.1829, a t-computed value of 0.7937, and the same degree of freedom (8) and t-critical value (2.306). As a result, both groups' assessments were deemed acceptable, and there is no significant difference between the evaluations of Civil Engineers and Architects. The assessment of the level of acceptability of the miniature model of the proposed capsule dormitory at Bestlink College of the Philippines, MV campus, was generally deemed acceptable. There was no significant difference between the assessments of the two groups of respondents: civil engineers and architects, in terms of construction materials, structural design, floor plan, space efficiency, and presentation. The overall weighted mean for the civil engineers was 3.21, while the architects scored 2.99, indicating agreement in their evaluations. For further improvements, respondents recommended widening the door partitions in the upper section of the miniature model, particularly in the structural design aspect.