DRIED GUMAMELA FLOWER (HIBISCUS SABDARIFFA) AS AN AGGREGATE TO BODY WASH
Keywords:
body wash, natural exfoliant, dried gumamela flower, hibiscus sabdariffa, skin cleansing, moisturizing, fragrance, surfactants, foam booster, product acceptability, quantitative study, chemists, dermatologists, formulation optimization, sustainable sAbstract
Body washes play a vital role in cleansing and revitalizing the skin, and the integration of natural exfoliants can significantly elevate their performance. The dried Gumamela flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa) emerges as an innovative and sustainable exfoliating agent, owing to its rich phytochemical profile and skin-beneficial properties such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and moisturizing effects. Incorporating this natural ingredient not only facilitates gentle yet effective exfoliation but also aligns with the growing consumer demand for eco-friendly and chemical-free skincare solutions. This study seeks to evaluate the practicality and efficacy of using dried Gumamela flower as a natural aggregate in body wash formulations, aiming to enhance their cleansing efficiency, promote skin health, and contribute to sustainable cosmetic development. A quantitative experimental approach was adopted in this study, with purposive sampling employed to select participants. The acceptability of dried Gumamela flower (Hibiscus sabdariffa) as an exfoliating additive in body wash formulations was assessed through survey questionnaires. Key evaluation criteria included ease of rinsing, moisturizing capability, cleansing effectiveness, fragrance, and product presentation. Weighted mean scores were computed to summarize overall acceptability, while an independent t-test was used to compare responses between two expert panels comprising five chemists and five dermatologists. The evaluation of the body wash containing dried Gumamela flower across parameters: ease of rinsing, moisturizing effect, cleansing efficacy, fragrance, and presentation, was rated as "highly acceptable." The chemists’ group yielded an overall mean score of 3.50, corresponding to "highly acceptable," while the dermatologists’ group obtained a mean score of 3.04, interpreted as "acceptable." The variance within the chemists’ responses was 0.093, whereas that of the dermatologists was 0.454. Statistical analysis using an independent t-test resulted in a computed t-value of 0.951, which is below the critical t-value of 3.355 (α = 0.01, df = 8). This indicates no statistically significant difference between the assessments of the two expert groups. To further optimize the body wash formulation, the respondents offered several insightful recommendations. Foremost, the product’s current strong odor should be carefully moderated either by reducing its intensity or by reformulating to introduce a more appealing and balanced fragrance profile that aligns with consumer preferences. Additionally, the inclusion of effective surfactants is strongly encouraged to significantly enhance cleansing performance and ensure thorough removal of impurities. Finally, incorporating a foam booster is suggested to improve lather richness and texture, thereby elevating the overall sensory experience and consumer satisfaction, ultimately enhancing the product’s market competitiveness.