A Proposed Model of Storm Drain Tunnel in Jipapad, Eastern Samar

Vol.3, No.1D

Abstract

The study aims to construct the Proposed storm drain tunnel in Jipapad Eastern Samar. The researchers encountered problems. One of the problems encountered is how the respondents assess the level of acceptability in terms of the concept, structural design, suitability of materials and presentation, known as the SOP (Statement of the Study); the study necessary to give the readers and others future researchers knowledge and importance of construction, further reading the content will give the readers or the future researchers the important details such as how the miniature is constructed the results and the discussions. The current state of the study is almost done. It undergoes minor revisions, such as the grammar and illustrations for the research papers and also minor revisions of the product to attain greater satisfaction. The research design used for the study was quantitative experimental research while utilizing purposive and simple random techniques. The statistical treatment used for this study was the F-test or Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine the difference between the two groups of respondents. 

The study's respondents are five professional civil engineers and five architects. The following procedures were undertaken in developing the model: preparing the materials needed, cutting the popsicle sticks, and sticking them together with stick glue to make a house. On an illustration board, place the four (4) houses that have been made; for an illustration board, put PVC in the centre of the illustration board, then cement on each side; make a hole in the houses, then put the straw in each hole, The proposed Drain tunnel can now present. The study results regarding the construction materials, designs and procedures, and mechanism to waterways for overflowing waters from drainage are Strongly acceptable. The acquired overall mean of the Professional Engineers was 3.77, interpreted as Strongly Acceptable; Professional Architects were 3.8, interpreted as Strongly Acceptable. It indicates no significant difference between the assessments of the two groups of respondents. For further improvement of the project, the respondents recommend that the researchers avoid unnecessary expenses and expensive materials; they also recommend that adding additional pieces may give more attractiveness to the project, as well as adding lights for the miniature.