Oplan Cola (Continuous Learners Assessment): An Intervention Program for Enscimafilap
Keywords:
BLOOM TAXONOMY, SCAFFOLDING, INTERVENTION, AND ASSESSMENTAbstract
INTRODUCTION
The research study entitled OPLAN COLA (Continuous Learners Assessment) focuses on determining the achievement level of the participants before and after the implementation of the intervention for ENSCIMAFILAP.
METHODS
Descriptive Method of research was used on the study wherein sixty participants were purposively selected to undergo the intervention program. The program consists of five questions of varying degree base on Blooms Taxonomy and Gagnes nine levels of learning. Pre-test and Post-test were given before and after the intervention to determine the status of the participants in each learning areas. Mean, Standard Deviation, and Mean Percentage Score was used to interpret the data collected. The difference between Mean Percentage Scores was used to know the improvement seen in each subject areas.
RESULTS
Results showed that the distribution of score was not that widely spread compared to Science that has a standard deviation of 7.24 which means that the scores were widely spread. The homogeneity of scores was high on English, Mathematics, Filipino and Araling Panlipunan. Considering the Mean Percentage Score of the five learning and based on the legend used on the LOA the mastery level of students on the five learning areas were still at the low mastery level. Moreover, results showed that Araling Panlipunan had the highest mean that was equal to 54.33 with an MPS of 90.55 while Filipino had the lowest result. The mastery level of the students based on MPS and the legend used forLOA result, all scores fall on closely approaching mastery.
DISCUSSIONS
Based on the result presented the following were observed; First, the formative assessment would help on eliminating difficulties on least mastered competencies. Second, retention of concepts discussed during the quarter was enhanced. Third, participants became more familiar with the type of questioning given. These facts were proven by the difference in Mean Percentage Scores of the participants wherein the low mastery level of the participants was closely approaching mastery after the intervention.