The Teaching for Deeper Thinking of Teachers in the Public Schools
Keywords:
ThinkingAbstract
INTRODUCTION
This paper will discuss the following concepts: teachers are supplemental material in the classroom; a cautionary word; creating a classroom culture of Think Aloud; and helping pupils merge their lives and their learning.
METHODS
This study used descriptive research though correlational pattern was observed, Descriptive studies report summary data such as measures of levels, correlations, deviance from the mean and comparison of variables.
RESULTS
The Student Respondents on Deep Thinking Skill, its total Weighted Mean is 2.08 -: Average Thinking. All indicators received an interpretation of AVEREAGE THINKING. Level of Skills of Teachers in Using Deep Thinking Questions, its total Weighted Mean is 3.75 -: Mostly True. With total 15 number of indicators, regardless of total Weighted Mean per indicator, all items received an interpretation of MOSTLY TRUE TO THE TEACHER. The first correlation is between Level of Deep Question used and Level of Skills, these variables received a r value of -: .187 and Sig of .118, the decision is to Accept the Hypothesis with interpretation of NO SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP. Next is the relationship between Level of Skills and Elements used in Deep Thinking, these variables received a r value of .590 and Sig of .000, the decision is to Reject the Hypothesis, with interpretation of WITH STRONGPOSITIVE CORRELATION. Last is the relationship between Level of Deep Questioned Used and Element Used in Deep Thinking, these variables received a r value of .107 with Sig of.376, the decision is to Accept Hypothesis, with interpretation of NO SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP.
DISCUSSIONS
The results demonstrate the level of the pupil respondents (grades 5 and 6) on deep thinking skill is Average Thinking. The Level of the Teacher on Using Deep Question is Mostly True of Me. On the Element Used by Teacher in Deep Question Skill is " Somewhat Used Skill”. On Correlational Relationship, all other variables No Significant Relationships, except between Level of Skills and Element Used in Deep Thinking by the Teachers, which Posted a STRONG SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIPS