Principal's Functions for Implementation of K 12 Curriculum in Junior High School for Teachers at Magdalena Integrated National High School
Keywords:
PRINCIPAL'S FUNCTION, K TO 12 CURRICULUM, and IMPLEMENTATION, COACHING, MONITORING, EVALUATIONAbstract
INTRODUCTION
Management is a practice rather than a science or a profession though containing elements of both according to Drucker (1977). Principals may need two types of vision: one vision of their schools and the roles they play in those schools, and another vision of how the change process will proceed (Manasse, 1985). The above scenarios greatly motivated the present researcher to find the function of the principals to find the program and projects to have the educational outcome to the students, teachers, and community
METHODS
Descriptive designed with intense accuracy to surface out the meaningful aspects of the data from those phenomena observed during the process of the investigation. One set of questionnaires was issued to the actual respondents of this study. The items in the said questionnaires were based on the basic problems advanced in this study for objectivity, relevance and suitability to the problem areas investigated, as well as the probability of favorable reception and return from the said respondents.
RESULTS
The principal's functions in regard to Instructional, Institutional, Supervisory, Administrative, Interpersonal, Informational, and Resource allocator are significant in regard toK12 Curriculum implementation in terms of planning, monitoring, coaching, and evaluation are also significant therefore the hypothesis is supported.
DISCUSSIONS
The principal's function in relation to instructional with the (M=4.45, S=.30) with very much evident, relation to institutional with (M=4.32, S=.17) very much evident, in supervisory (M=4.07, S=.16) with the mark of evident. in administrative with the (M=4.33, S=.32) mark of evident, in interpersonal with (M=4.28, S=.24) very much evident ,in informational with the (M=4.52, S=.17) very much evident, in relation to resource allocator with the (M=4.23, S=.12) in terms of level of implementation (M=4.56, S=.41) with very much in terms of monitoring (M=4.51, S=.21) with very much evident in coaching (M=4.72, S=.37) and in terms of evaluation (M=4.02, S=.19) mark evident . The functions of the principal have a huge effect on the implementation of the K-12 curriculum, and aware of the result in terms of monitoring, coaching, and evaluation of the K12.