Athletes, Coaches, Trainers, Supervisors/School Heads (Acts) Stewardship Self-Assessment and the In-House Training of Quirino Athletic Delegation for the Cavraa 2017: An Analysis

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring athletic preparation facilitates the evaluation and adjustment of practices to optimize performance outcomes. Self-report measures such as questionnaires and diaries are suggested as simple and cost-effective approaches to monitoring an athlete's response to training. However, their efficacy is dependent on how they are implemented and used.

METHODS

This study sought to identify the perceived self-assessment on the in-house training of Quirino Athletic Delegation. A survey questionnaire was distributed while semi-structured interviews were conducted with athletes, coaches, trainers and supervisors, and school heads.

RESULTS

Based on the results of the study, the supervisors and school heads had done an excellent performance in the preparation of the in-house training as manifested in the average mean of 4.14, while the self-assessment of coach performance has a mean of 3.84, interpreted as good, and 4.07 for trainers performance self-assessment, interpreted as excellent, and for athletes performance, self-assessment has a mean of 2.79, interpreted as acceptable.

DISCUSSIONS

In view of these findings, the following were recommended: that top management should provide training for coaches who are handling different sports events to give the athletes’ needs; intensify and strengthen partnership with stakeholders to give full support to the sports program of the department; know the strengths and limitations of the trainers, coaches, and athletes. All of these will serve as the platform for decision-making.