STEM AS A CHOSEN STRAND: GOOD OR BAD CHOICE? A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY AMONG GRADE 11 STEM STUDENTS AT GENERAL DE JESUS COLLEGE

Abstract

The educational journey is a complex path marked by a series of decisions that significantly shape an individual’s future. Among these decisions, the selection of an academic strand is a pivotal moment that influences students’ higher education pathways and career prospects. This qualitative study aims to understand the decision-making process and lived experiences of Grade 11 STEM students, as well as to assess their perceptions of whether choosing the STEM strand is viewed favorably or unfavorably from their perspectives. The researchers employed a qualitative research methodology using a non-probability sampling technique known as quota sampling. A total of forty-five (45) Grade 11 students from General De Jesus College were selected as participants. Data were collected using a phenomenological research design through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews supported by audio recordings. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify emerging patterns and themes. The findings revealed that students considered multiple factors when choosing the STEM strand. Career pursuits and academic goals emerged as the primary factors influencing their decision. Other external factors, such as family and peer influence, socio-economic background, and academic performance, also played significant roles. The results further indicated that most students were “pretty satisfied” with their decision to pursue STEM, although some participants reported having unfulfilled expectations. The results highlight the importance of students carefully considering their individual strengths, interests, and aspirations when selecting an academic strand. Aligning personal goals with strand selection can help maximize students’ potential for success and increase satisfaction with their chosen academic path.