The Level Of Sbm Implementation In Relation To School Performance Indicators: Basis For Effective Administrative Planning

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Governments around the world are introducing a range of strategies aimed at improving the educative stages into an eminent one. Hence, the Department of Education in our country is questing for bearable programs to be implemented in respective public institutions. At such,as partner of the vision, school heads must be good implementers. By doing so, it requires remarkable practice on dynamic supervision as well as systematic planning to contribute in alleviating the educational status.

METHODS

The method used in the studyis one of the types of descriptive research, which is correlational survey. This is designed to determine the relationship of the two variables in the study, which are the level of implementation of School-based Management and School's performance Indicators whether their relationship is perfect, high, slight, or negligible. The independent variable was the level of implementation of School-Based Management and the dependent variable was School's Performance Indicator.

RESULTS

The overall assessment for Level 1 SY 2016-2017 was 69% (Moving Toward Stage) while for the SY 2017-2018 for level 3 was 86% (Accelerating Stage). As to the comparison of the different performance indicators: SY 2016-2017 had a dropout rate of 1.2%, participation rate of 87%, cohort-survival rate of 94%, and enrolment rate of 95% while in SY 2017-2018 has a dropout rate of 0.12%, participation rate 93%, cohort-survival rate 96% and enrolment rate of 98%. To determine whether the level of implementation of SBM significantly influence the school performance indicators, the T-Test was applied. The computed T at .05 alpha level with the df of 6 was 2.052 which is greater than the tabular value of 1.943. This implies that there is a significant difference.

DISCUSSIONS

The School-Based Management assessment for Level 1 SY 2016-2017 was assessed as Moving Toward Stage while the assessment for level 3 SY 2017-2018 was verified as Accelerating Stage. In giving distinction of the different performance indicators from SY 2016-2017 to 2017-2018, the dropout rate were observably diminished while the participation rate, cohort-survival rate and enrolment rate were highly increased. The levels of implementation of SBM practices significantly influence the school performance indicators. The two variables are affecting with one another.